On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 15:22:38 +1030 Joel Stanley <joel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 2:33 AM, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 14:49:32 +0000 > > Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> IIO is closed for this cycle anyway now. > >> Otherwise, series looks good. > >> > >> Will pick up when back with my main PC as traveling for this week and > >> next. > > > > Forgot to ask, do you want me to pick this up as a fix? > > Also does it make sense to tag it for stable? > > > > If not I can pick it up for the coming cycle. Given the code changes > > are small and well isolated I'm happy to do any of the 3 options, > > it really depends on whether the rest of the platform works well enough > > to be worth rushing these through? > > Without the clock driver upstream there's no rush to merge this. I'm > still waiting on review from the clock guys. > > Please queue them for 4.16. Thanks! Done - applied to the togreg branch of iio.git which will be pushed out as testing for the autobuilders to play with it. Thanks, Jonathan > > Cheers, > > Joel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
