On 11/30/13 12:24, Michał Mirosław wrote:
> 2013/11/30 Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>> On 11/30/13 12:15, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>>> On 11/19/13 10:36, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>>>> From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>
>>>> The mxs LRADC is able to read an internal die temperature sensor. The
>>>> temperature has to be calculated from the value read on channel 8 and channel 9.
>>>> To be able to expose the result to hwmon, implement iio channel 8 as
>>>> (channel 9 - channel 8). Then, implement IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE and
>>>> IIO_CHAN_INFO_OFFSET so that it can be processed by hwmon through the in kernel
>>>> provider/consumer mechanism.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> As this is still in staging, I think we can get away with the resulting
>>> ABI change from this patch.
>>>
>>> Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Jonathan
>> Having said that, there is an odd bit inline that I've just dropped whilst
>> applying the patch. Shout if I've done this wrong.
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>>>> 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c
>>>> index a08c1736458b..fec76090dae5 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c
>>>> @@ -231,20 +231,11 @@ struct mxs_lradc {
>>>> /*
>>>> * Raw I/O operations
>>>> */
>>>> -static int mxs_lradc_read_raw(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
>>>> - const struct iio_chan_spec *chan,
>>>> - int *val, int *val2, long m)
>>>> +static int mxs_lradc_read_single(struct iio_dev *iio_dev, int chan, int *val)
> [...]
>>>> @@ -269,7 +260,7 @@ static int mxs_lradc_read_raw(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
> [...]
>>>> - writel(chan->channel, lradc->base + LRADC_CTRL4 + STMP_OFFSET_REG_SET);
>>>> + writel(chan, lradc->base + LRADC_CTRL4 + STMP_OFFSET_REG_SET);
>>
>> This doesn't make any sense. I'm guessing it drifted in from a different patch?
>
> 'chan' changed type here, and the function got a new name. I would
> assume thant this won't build if you dropped the part above.
Right you are... I'll fix this up later if I can. For now I'll drop it from my tree.
>
> Best Regards,
> Michał Mirosław
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
