2013/11/30 Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx>: > On 11/30/13 12:15, Jonathan Cameron wrote: >> On 11/19/13 10:36, Maxime Ripard wrote: >>> From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> The mxs LRADC is able to read an internal die temperature sensor. The >>> temperature has to be calculated from the value read on channel 8 and channel 9. >>> To be able to expose the result to hwmon, implement iio channel 8 as >>> (channel 9 - channel 8). Then, implement IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE and >>> IIO_CHAN_INFO_OFFSET so that it can be processed by hwmon through the in kernel >>> provider/consumer mechanism. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Reviewed-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@xxxxxxxxxx> >> As this is still in staging, I think we can get away with the resulting >> ABI change from this patch. >> >> Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git >> >> Thanks, >> >> Jonathan > Having said that, there is an odd bit inline that I've just dropped whilst > applying the patch. Shout if I've done this wrong. >>> --- >>> drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ >>> 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c >>> index a08c1736458b..fec76090dae5 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c >>> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c >>> @@ -231,20 +231,11 @@ struct mxs_lradc { >>> /* >>> * Raw I/O operations >>> */ >>> -static int mxs_lradc_read_raw(struct iio_dev *iio_dev, >>> - const struct iio_chan_spec *chan, >>> - int *val, int *val2, long m) >>> +static int mxs_lradc_read_single(struct iio_dev *iio_dev, int chan, int *val) [...] >>> @@ -269,7 +260,7 @@ static int mxs_lradc_read_raw(struct iio_dev *iio_dev, [...] >>> - writel(chan->channel, lradc->base + LRADC_CTRL4 + STMP_OFFSET_REG_SET); >>> + writel(chan, lradc->base + LRADC_CTRL4 + STMP_OFFSET_REG_SET); > > This doesn't make any sense. I'm guessing it drifted in from a different patch? 'chan' changed type here, and the function got a new name. I would assume thant this won't build if you dropped the part above. Best Regards, Michał Mirosław -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html