On 04/30/2013 03:59 AM, Sachin Kamat wrote: > On 29 April 2013 23:57, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 04/29/2013 07:18 PM, Sachin Kamat wrote: >>> Hi Jonathan, >>> >>> On 15 April 2013 16:16, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> On 15/04/13 09:22, Sachin Kamat wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 3 April 2013 11:53, Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Use the newly introduced devm_ioremap_resource() instead of >>>>>> devm_request_and_ioremap() which provides more consistent error handling. >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>> >>>> Not sure why I missed this one. I think I marked the entire thread >>>> as not ready based on the responses to patch 2. Clearly nothing wrong >>>> with this one! Will pick up for the next cycle now as I think it >>>> is a cleanup rather than an actual bug fix? >>>> >>>> Thanks for the ping. >>> >>> Looks like this patch has still not made it to your tree as I did not >>> find it in Greg's pull request to Linus. >>> I however saw two of my other iio patches in his pull request. >> >> The IIO tree was already closed at that point, so "next cycle" refers to 3.11 >> in this case. > > Oh OK. Got it :) > Thanks for the clarification. > Now finally applied to the togreg branch of iio.git. Will hopefully send upstream sometime over next few days at which point it will hit linux-next and be ready for the next merge cycle. Jonathan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
