On 04/29/2013 07:18 PM, Sachin Kamat wrote: > Hi Jonathan, > > On 15 April 2013 16:16, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 15/04/13 09:22, Sachin Kamat wrote: >>> >>> On 3 April 2013 11:53, Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> Use the newly introduced devm_ioremap_resource() instead of >>>> devm_request_and_ioremap() which provides more consistent error handling. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Not sure why I missed this one. I think I marked the entire thread >> as not ready based on the responses to patch 2. Clearly nothing wrong >> with this one! Will pick up for the next cycle now as I think it >> is a cleanup rather than an actual bug fix? >> >> Thanks for the ping. > > Looks like this patch has still not made it to your tree as I did not > find it in Greg's pull request to Linus. > I however saw two of my other iio patches in his pull request. The IIO tree was already closed at that point, so "next cycle" refers to 3.11 in this case. - Lars -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
