On 29 April 2013 23:57, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 04/29/2013 07:18 PM, Sachin Kamat wrote: >> Hi Jonathan, >> >> On 15 April 2013 16:16, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On 15/04/13 09:22, Sachin Kamat wrote: >>>> >>>> On 3 April 2013 11:53, Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Use the newly introduced devm_ioremap_resource() instead of >>>>> devm_request_and_ioremap() which provides more consistent error handling. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> Not sure why I missed this one. I think I marked the entire thread >>> as not ready based on the responses to patch 2. Clearly nothing wrong >>> with this one! Will pick up for the next cycle now as I think it >>> is a cleanup rather than an actual bug fix? >>> >>> Thanks for the ping. >> >> Looks like this patch has still not made it to your tree as I did not >> find it in Greg's pull request to Linus. >> I however saw two of my other iio patches in his pull request. > > The IIO tree was already closed at that point, so "next cycle" refers to 3.11 > in this case. Oh OK. Got it :) Thanks for the clarification. -- With warm regards, Sachin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
