Hi Jonathan, thanks for your comments and your support to my works! > Just a quick email to say I'm very happy with the state these patches are > now in. me too...:) > I have one utterly trivial point on patch 1 but am happy to fix > that up during the merge. (Basically you type cast a parameter to u16 instead > of __le16). no problem, in this days I can review and fix this issue. > Also right now I've only looked at 1 and 2 (assuming the others are > very similar for obvious reasons!) I will give them a look before merging > just in case anything slipped by. Yeah, the other patchs are very very similar. > Thanks for all your work on these. When I get some time I'll see what is needed > to add support for the lis3l02dq to this driver. From what I recall that > chip is a little dumber than some of the newer ones and needs some uggly > interrupt handling trickery. Given it's an ancient chip I doubt it is > terribly high on your list to support. I just happen to have one on my > test board so it's always been of inordinate interest to me ;) If I have a little bit of time, I can check what is needed to add support for the lis3l02dq! Denis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
