On 01/09/2013 12:06 PM, Denis CIOCCA wrote: > Hi guys, > > sorry but yesterday I sended to you the wrong patch! I attach the last (correct) patchs for the linux-next kernel and I have modified the config names in according with Alessandro suggestion. > Thanks > > Denis > Hi Denis, Just a quick email to say I'm very happy with the state these patches are now in. I have one utterly trivial point on patch 1 but am happy to fix that up during the merge. (Basically you type cast a parameter to u16 instead of __le16). However, given the size of the series I would like to leave them sitting on the mailing list for a little while (maybe until next Saturday given my usual timetable for such things) in case anyone else wants to review them. Also right now I've only looked at 1 and 2 (assuming the others are very similar for obvious reasons!) I will give them a look before merging just in case anything slipped by. Thanks for all your work on these. When I get some time I'll see what is needed to add support for the lis3l02dq to this driver. From what I recall that chip is a little dumber than some of the newer ones and needs some uggly interrupt handling trickery. Given it's an ancient chip I doubt it is terribly high on your list to support. I just happen to have one on my test board so it's always been of inordinate interest to me ;) Jonathan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
