On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 06:09:06PM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > On 11/16/2011 05:56 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > > No, really - just do something legible and robust. For example, teach > > regmap_readable() about the cache. > Doesn't make much sense. We call regmap_readable from regcache_read, which > is only called if we use a cache. So if we let regmap_readable return true > in case we use a cache it will always be true in regcache_read and we can > drop the check entirely. We should at least check that we actually have a cached value there - the cache is sparse after all. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
