On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 04:39, Hennerich, Michael wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote on 2010-10-25: >> On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 19:35, Jonathan Cameron wrote: >>> * I want some proper proposals of abi's for the new classes of device. >>> Lets debate Âthese on list. I would probably get round to doing this >>> myself eventually, but Âif someone who knows the device class does it, >>> things will proceed much faster. ÂI've never used a resolver and had to >>> google what they were ;) ÂHaving poorly defined abi's has bitten us a >>> few times in the past and tends to Âput others off using the subsystem. >>> ÂSo lets at least bash out what they should Âbe even if it takes a >>> little while to bring the drivers up to date. >> >> that'd be for Michael Hennerich > > We can start debating and refining on the exact API, to use. > However I like to do so once these drivers have merged. > The ones likely subject to change we can mark as EXPERIMENTAL. > Or even print a warning using dev_warn() on probe. i dont think that's necessary. we're already in the staging area which is labeled as "worse" than EXPERIMENTAL. -mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
