On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 2:53 AM, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > ATA devices don't send D2H Reg FIS after an successful ATA PIO data-in > command. The host is supposed to take the E_Status of the preceding > PIO Setup FIS. Update ahci_qc_fill_rtf() such that it takes E_Status > after a successful ATA PIO data-in command. > > Without this patch, result_tf for such a command is filled with the > content of the previous D2H Reg FIS which belongs to a previous > command, which can make the command incorrectly seen as failed. > > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> > Reported-by: Mark Lord <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxx > --- > drivers/ata/ahci.h | 1 + > drivers/ata/libahci.c | 17 ++++++++++++++--- > 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci.h b/drivers/ata/ahci.h > index e5fdeeb..d1a0f5b 100644 > --- a/drivers/ata/ahci.h > +++ b/drivers/ata/ahci.h > @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ enum { > AHCI_CMD_RESET = (1 << 8), > AHCI_CMD_CLR_BUSY = (1 << 10), > > + RX_FIS_PIO_SETUP = 0x20, /* offset of PIO Setup FIS data */ > RX_FIS_D2H_REG = 0x40, /* offset of D2H Register FIS data */ > RX_FIS_SDB = 0x58, /* offset of SDB FIS data */ > RX_FIS_UNK = 0x60, /* offset of Unknown FIS data */ > diff --git a/drivers/ata/libahci.c b/drivers/ata/libahci.c > index 8eea309..0c482a0 100644 > --- a/drivers/ata/libahci.c > +++ b/drivers/ata/libahci.c > @@ -1830,12 +1830,23 @@ static unsigned int ahci_qc_issue(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc) > static bool ahci_qc_fill_rtf(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc) > { > struct ahci_port_priv *pp = qc->ap->private_data; > - u8 *d2h_fis = pp->rx_fis + RX_FIS_D2H_REG; > + u8 *rx_fis = pp->rx_fis; > > if (pp->fbs_enabled) > - d2h_fis += qc->dev->link->pmp * AHCI_RX_FIS_SZ; > + rx_fis += qc->dev->link->pmp * AHCI_RX_FIS_SZ; > + > + /* > + * After a successful execution of an ATA PIO data-in command, > + * the device doesn't send D2H Reg FIS to update the TF and > + * the host should take Status from E_Status of the preceding > + * PIO Setup FIS. > + */ > + if (qc->tf.protocol == ATA_PROT_PIO && qc->dma_dir == DMA_FROM_DEVICE && > + !(qc->flags & ATA_QCFLAG_FAILED)) > + qc->result_tf.command = (rx_fis + RX_FIS_PIO_SETUP)[15]; Shouldn't we be reading the entire TF from the PIO setup FIS and then just replacing the command register value with the E_Status field? It looks like that's the only field in the TF that's being set here. > + else > + ata_tf_from_fis(rx_fis + RX_FIS_D2H_REG, &qc->result_tf); > > - ata_tf_from_fis(d2h_fis, &qc->result_tf); > return true; > } > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html