On Tue, Feb 23 2010, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > On Tuesday 23 February 2010 07:23:24 am Jens Axboe wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 22 2010, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > > DISCLAIMER: the fact of getting patches merged into atang tree means > > > that from now on they will be getting updates for changes happening > > > in atang tree and it should not be treated as an indication regarding > > > decisions taken by 'upstream' kernel trees > > > > > > > > > Fix 2.6.32 regression bringing back the desired SSD performance. > > > > > > [ 'upstream' may want to wait for a proper resolution, for atang tree > > > performance of big non-ATA boxes owned by a very few people is not > > > of such a big concern as a major regression on a commodity hardware ] > > > > What is the point of this, other than continuing your past history of > > political tirades? > > I worry that you may be reading too much into it -- I don't use Linus' > tree or linux-next tree any longer so the next kernel I would see fix > for the issue is most likely 2.6.34 and there is a little point from my > personal perspective in waiting for such long time.. It'll go into 2.6.33, I already prepared an updated for-linus branch this morning and will send it out later today. -- Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
