On Mon, Feb 22 2010, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > DISCLAIMER: the fact of getting patches merged into atang tree means > that from now on they will be getting updates for changes happening > in atang tree and it should not be treated as an indication regarding > decisions taken by 'upstream' kernel trees > > > Fix 2.6.32 regression bringing back the desired SSD performance. > > [ 'upstream' may want to wait for a proper resolution, for atang tree > performance of big non-ATA boxes owned by a very few people is not > of such a big concern as a major regression on a commodity hardware ] What is the point of this, other than continuing your past history of political tirades? -- Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
