On Tuesday 23 February 2010 07:23:24 am Jens Axboe wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22 2010, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > DISCLAIMER: the fact of getting patches merged into atang tree means > > that from now on they will be getting updates for changes happening > > in atang tree and it should not be treated as an indication regarding > > decisions taken by 'upstream' kernel trees > > > > > > Fix 2.6.32 regression bringing back the desired SSD performance. > > > > [ 'upstream' may want to wait for a proper resolution, for atang tree > > performance of big non-ATA boxes owned by a very few people is not > > of such a big concern as a major regression on a commodity hardware ] > > What is the point of this, other than continuing your past history of > political tirades? I worry that you may be reading too much into it -- I don't use Linus' tree or linux-next tree any longer so the next kernel I would see fix for the issue is most likely 2.6.34 and there is a little point from my personal perspective in waiting for such long time.. -- Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
