Re: HSM violations from ATA PACKET cmd ABRT errors in initial comms with LG GH22 SATA DVDRW

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mikael Pettersson wrote:
Robert Hancock writes:
 > On 12/27/2009 02:37 PM, thomas schorpp wrote:
 > > LG GH22NS40 NL01 (possibly Renesas chipset)
 > > VIA8237 SATA (produces basically same errors), Promise SATA II 150 20579
 > > HBAs.
 > >
 > > Linux 2.6.32.2
 > > hal polling
 > > devkit polling
 > > wodim
 > > growisofs
 > >
 > > port_status 0x20280000 (Data Transfer Overrun Error & Target Device Fault)?
 > >
 > > Looks like a hardware combination incompatibility.
 > > Most applicable ATA_HORKAGES in sourcecode already tried.
 > >
 > > Not found the sense code yet since FEATURE specific according to
 > > T13/1410D revision 3b.
 > >
 > > Comments?
 > >
 > > y
 > > tom
 > >
 > > dmesg |grep -A 10 ata
 > >
 > > sata_promise 0000:00:0d.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 17
 > > scsi5 : sata_promise
 > > scsi6 : sata_promise
 > > scsi7 : sata_promise
 > > ata6: SATA max UDMA/133 mmio m4096@0xfbefe000 ata 0xfbefe200 irq 17
 > > ata7: SATA max UDMA/133 mmio m4096@0xfbefe000 ata 0xfbefe280 irq 17
 > > ata8: PATA max UDMA/133 mmio m4096@0xfbefe000 ata 0xfbefe300 irq 17
 > > ata6: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300)
 > > ata6.00: ATAPI: HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GH22NS40, NL01, max UDMA/100
 > > ata6.00: configured for UDMA/100
 > > scsi 5:0:0:0: CD-ROM HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GH22NS40 NL01 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
 > > sr0: scsi3-mmc drive: 125x/125x writer dvd-ram cd/rw xa/form2 cdda tray
 > > sr 5:0:0:0: Attached scsi CD-ROM sr0
 > > sr 5:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg2 type 5
 > > ata7: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
 > > ata6.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x6
 > > ata6.00: port_status 0x20280000
 > > sr 5:0:0:0: [sr0] CDB: cdb[0]=0x28: 28 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 40 00
 > > ata6.00: cmd a0/01:00:00:00:fc/00:00:00:00:00/a0 tag 0 dma 131072 in
 > > res 51/54:03:00:00:fc/00:00:00:00:00/e0 Emask 0x2 (HSM violation)
 > > ata6.00: status: { DRDY ERR }
 > > ata6: hard resetting link
 > > ata6: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300)
 > > ata6.00: configured for UDMA/100
 > > ata6: EH complete
 > > ...
 > > <period, ~10 times in series>
 > > ...
 > > ata6.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x6
 > > ata6.00: port_status 0x20280000
 > > sr 5:0:0:0: [sr0] CDB: cdb[0]=0x28: 28 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 02 00
 > > ata6.00: cmd a0/01:00:00:00:10/00:00:00:00:00/a0 tag 0 dma 4096 in
 > > res 51/54:03:00:00:10/00:00:00:00:00/e0 Emask 0x2 (HSM violation)
 > > ata6.00: status: { DRDY ERR }
 > > ata6: hard resetting link
 > > ata6: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300)
 > > ata6.00: configured for UDMA/100
 > > ata6: EH complete
 > > ata6.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x6
 > > ata6.00: port_status 0x20280000
 > > sr 5:0:0:0: [sr0] CDB: cdb[0]=0x28: 28 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 02 00
 > > ata6.00: cmd a0/01:00:00:00:10/00:00:00:00:00/a0 tag 0 dma 4096 in
 > > res 51/54:03:00:00:10/00:00:00:00:00/e0 Emask 0x2 (HSM violation)
 > > ata6.00: status: { DRDY ERR }
 > > ata6: hard resetting link
 > > ata6: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300)
 > > ata6.00: configured for UDMA/100
 > > ata6: EH complete
 > > ata6.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x6
 > > ata6.00: port_status 0x20280000
 > > sr 5:0:0:0: [sr0] CDB: cdb[0]=0x28: 28 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 02 00
 > > ata6.00: cmd a0/01:00:00:00:10/00:00:00:00:00/a0 tag 0 dma 4096 in
 > > res 51/54:03:00:00:10/00:00:00:00:00/e0 Emask 0x2 (HSM violation)
 > > ata6.00: status: { DRDY ERR }
 > > ata6: hard resetting link
 > > ata6: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300)
 > > ata6.00: configured for UDMA/100
 > > sr 5:0:0:0: [sr0] Result: hostbyte=0x00 driverbyte=0x08
 > > sr 5:0:0:0: [sr0] Sense Key : 0x5 [current] Info fld=0x0
 > > sr 5:0:0:0: [sr0] ASC=0x21 ASCQ=0x0
 > > sr 5:0:0:0: [sr0] CDB: cdb[0]=0x28: 28 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 02 00
> > Well, it's a READ command, and the response is "LOGICAL BLOCK ADDRESS > OUT OF RANGE". Seems reasonable if it's a blank disc in the drive (is it?)

Yes.

> > According to the code comments in sata_promise, "overrun error" means > the S/G byte count was larger than the drive requires. Which I suppose > would happen here, because the drive didn't actually transfer any data. > sata_promise raises an HSM error on that though which triggers resets > and such. Seems like an overreaction, for ATAPI commands anyway, as that > can happen normally. CCing Mikael.

Thanks for the report. I'll try to come up with a patch to reduce
the severity of overruns to something less than HSM.

 > What were the errors you were seeing on the VIA controller?

See previous mails in thread.


I'd like to see that too.

See previous mails in thread.


/Mikael

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux