On 11/27/2009 02:47 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
Hello, I wrote:
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx>
---
Sergei, XFER_UDMA_5 timing also looks suspicious,
please take a look when you have a minute, thanks.
Yeah, but it's the same as XFER_UDMA_4, so actually underclocked...
However, it matches what the HPT371N datasheet and the vendor drivers
have. The 'hpt366' driver uses more speedy mode, with 22.5 ns cycle. ;-)
I have just verified: this driver has always used this timing
historically, at least for HPT372+ chips.
Could you clarify which "this timing" you are referring to? :) I never
saw an Acked-by on this one.
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
