On 11/26/2009 12:23 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
MWDMA0 timings cannot be met with the PIIX based controller
programming interface.
This change should be safe as this is how we have been doing
things in IDE it8213 host driver for years.
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx>
---
Verified with the documentation (similar case as with pata_efar).
Uhhh, no...
Too many damn drivers.
Too much damn duplication.
Too much damn subtle differences here and there.
The hardware is probably fine for MWMDA0 when it comes to
pata_{efar,it8213},
it just not documented properly in the data sheet.
How so with pata_efar? The active/recovery bitfields are still 2-bit
wide, no?
So.... pata_it8213 is fine for MWDMA0, then?
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
