Re: [PROPOSED] ata: Report 16/32bit PIO as best we can

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tejun Heo wrote:
> Alan Cox wrote:
>>> Thus 'set' has always been an illusion for libata.  It's really been 
>>> read-only.
>> Which nicely solves the flags2 problem - we have flags, and we have
>> dynamic flags and if we move the other changing flags into dynflags over
>> time all will be happy.
> 
> Umm... there's already ap->pflags for the purpose and it was splitted
> out for exactly the same reason.  If we're running out of flags space,
> I think we better switch to bitfields than introducing flagsN and
                                 ^^^^^
				 map
Sorry, sleep deprived.  :-)

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux