Re: [PATCH] libata-core More robust parsing for multi_count(v5)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tejun Heo wrote:
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Yeah, that has long been a design decision -- avoid all the mechanics of
PIO-Multi, simply because we did not have much of a need for it (and
still don't).

Albert Lee worked on PIO-Multi a while ago, which was mainly to get
ATA_{12,16} working, IIRC.

But overall, I don't see much of a need to introduce it into the main
stack?

Well, there still are awful lot of PIO only devices out in the wild,
so improving PIO support seems like a good idea?
..


Tons of CompactFlash cards are used PIO-only with Linux,
and systems could benefit from the reduced interrupt overhead
that multiple gives.  Especially since those same systems tend
to have rather modest embedded CPUs.

We *already* do multiple-sector I/O in libata.
But it currently works partially by accident,
and probably gets shut off much of the time
whenever the EH code is invoked and resets anything.

Cheers

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux