Re: [PATCH] libata-core More robust parsing for multi_count(v5)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Yeah, that has long been a design decision -- avoid all the mechanics of
> PIO-Multi, simply because we did not have much of a need for it (and
> still don't).
> 
> Albert Lee worked on PIO-Multi a while ago, which was mainly to get
> ATA_{12,16} working, IIRC.
> 
> But overall, I don't see much of a need to introduce it into the main
> stack?

Well, there still are awful lot of PIO only devices out in the wild,
so improving PIO support seems like a good idea?

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux