Re: How to determine performance bottleneck?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Pierre Ossman wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:12:20 +0900
> Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> Pierre Ossman wrote:
>>> Do you remember if that's a new chip designation, or 3132 (rev 02)?
>>> Just so I know what to keep an eye out for.
>> Yeah, it had a new designation.  Something like 3132-2 (don't confuse it
>> with 3132 2 ports or 3132 2 ports SATA 2, yeah a lot of 2s there).
>>
> 
> Ok. Thanks for all the info. :)
> 
> Any objections to putting this on the wiki, so the next person having
> less than expected performance doesn't have to ask on the mailing list?

Hmmm... Let me check this with SIMG first so that I have more concrete
idea about which ones have what kind of limit and whether there are any
which don't have such limitations.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux