Pierre Ossman wrote: > On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:37:41 +0900 > Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Pierre Ossman wrote: >>> Bummer. Is this per port, or is it the PCIe side of the chip that is >>> limited to this speed? >> I think it's on the host bus side. >> >>> What do the silicon image guys have to say about it? >> ISTR they confirmed the problem but I don't remember talking too much >> about it. >> > > The optimist in me was hoping that this could be a problem that can be > sidestepped with a clever enough implementation. :) > >>>> There's 3132-2 chip on the market. Maybe it's worth a try? >>> Now that model number was not something that was easily found on >>> google, nor on silicon image's website. Know of any boards with that >>> chip? >> Somebody wrote me an email about it. Looking up... eh.. can't find. Sorry. >> > > Do you remember if that's a new chip designation, or 3132 (rev 02)? > Just so I know what to keep an eye out for. Yeah, it had a new designation. Something like 3132-2 (don't confuse it with 3132 2 ports or 3132 2 ports SATA 2, yeah a lot of 2s there). -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
