On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:37:41 +0900
Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Pierre Ossman wrote:
> >
> > Bummer. Is this per port, or is it the PCIe side of the chip that is
> > limited to this speed?
>
> I think it's on the host bus side.
>
> > What do the silicon image guys have to say about it?
>
> ISTR they confirmed the problem but I don't remember talking too much
> about it.
>
The optimist in me was hoping that this could be a problem that can be
sidestepped with a clever enough implementation. :)
> >> There's 3132-2 chip on the market. Maybe it's worth a try?
> >
> > Now that model number was not something that was easily found on
> > google, nor on silicon image's website. Know of any boards with that
> > chip?
>
> Somebody wrote me an email about it. Looking up... eh.. can't find. Sorry.
>
Do you remember if that's a new chip designation, or 3132 (rev 02)?
Just so I know what to keep an eye out for.
Rgds
--
-- Pierre Ossman
Linux kernel, MMC maintainer http://www.kernel.org
rdesktop, core developer http://www.rdesktop.org
WARNING: This correspondence is being monitored by the
Swedish government. Make sure your server uses encryption
for SMTP traffic and consider using PGP for end-to-end
encryption.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
