Re: How to determine performance bottleneck?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:12:20 +0900
Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Pierre Ossman wrote:
> > 
> > Do you remember if that's a new chip designation, or 3132 (rev 02)?
> > Just so I know what to keep an eye out for.
> 
> Yeah, it had a new designation.  Something like 3132-2 (don't confuse it
> with 3132 2 ports or 3132 2 ports SATA 2, yeah a lot of 2s there).
> 

Ok. Thanks for all the info. :)

Any objections to putting this on the wiki, so the next person having
less than expected performance doesn't have to ask on the mailing list?

Rgds
-- 
     -- Pierre Ossman

  Linux kernel, MMC maintainer        http://www.kernel.org
  rdesktop, core developer          http://www.rdesktop.org

  WARNING: This correspondence is being monitored by the
  Swedish government. Make sure your server uses encryption
  for SMTP traffic and consider using PGP for end-to-end
  encryption.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux