Re: [patch 1/1] LIBATA: Allow devices without IRQ specified to fall back

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 12:50:42 +0100
Ben Dooks <ben-linux@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 12:13:28PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > I had a look, and there doesn't seem to be any way of specifying an
> > > IRQ for a host port when registering with libata-sff.c, which is a
> > > problem since we need to be able to either pass-in or have a callback
> > > to allow our "quirk" to specify a new IRQ for the device.
> > 
> > Currently there is not. However if the device as a whole is wired to IRQ
> > 14 you want to quirk pdev->irq.
> 
> That would be great if both channels are mapped to 14, however the
> mapping set by default is for each channel to have an unique IRQ.

Ok so you've got a board reporting native mode using the legacy IRQ
numbering (14/15 - or platform equivalents) ? In which case may I suggest
you rewrite the header to indicate it is in legacy mode as per the BIOS
guide ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux