Re: [patch 1/1] LIBATA: Allow devices without IRQ specified to fall back

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 12:14:50PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Does anyone know if the ALi M5229 actually exists outside of one of
> > the M1543 bridges?
> 
> Yes - it exists in various forms in all sorts of ALi/ULi chipset products.
> 
> > Note, this hardly seems to be a board-quirk, it is more of a device
> > quirk...
> 
> Your description so far is of "device not put in a valid configuration
> according to the spec"  - that seems to me to be board problems.

No, the configuration is correct, you cannot assign this device an
PCI IRQ when it is embedded in the M1543 bridge. The bridge itself
has other configuration registers that specify where the IDE IRQs
get routed.

-- 
Ben

Q:      What's a light-year?
A:      One-third less calories than a regular year.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux