[PATCH] Re: [git patches] libata updates - (improve post-reset device ready test) regression

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
Tejun Heo (12):
      libata: improve post-reset device ready test

This commit (78ab88f04f44bed566d51dce0c7cbfeff6449a06) causes a long
boot delay with my onboard Promise controller. It seems like libata
probes for a nonexisting PATA drive...

ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:08.0[A] -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 18
scsi0 : sata_promise
scsi1 : sata_promise
scsi2 : sata_promise
ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 mmio m4096@0xfb600000 port 0xfb600200 irq 18
ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 mmio m4096@0xfb600000 port 0xfb600280 irq 18
ata3: PATA max UDMA/133 mmio m4096@0xfb600000 port 0xfb600300 irq 18
ata1: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
ata2: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300)
ata2.00: ATA-7: SAMSUNG HD753LJ, 1AA01109, max UDMA7
ata2.00: 1465149168 sectors, multi 0: LBA48 NCQ (depth 0/32)
ata2.00: configured for UDMA/133 ata3: link is slow to respond, please be patient (ready=0)
ata3: device not ready (errno=-16), forcing hardreset
ata3: link is slow to respond, please be patient (ready=0)
ata3: SRST failed (errno=-16)
ata3: link is slow to respond, please be patient (ready=0)
ata3: SRST failed (errno=-16)
ata3: link is slow to respond, please be patient (ready=0)
ata3: SRST failed (errno=-16)
  - Last output repeated twice -
ata3: reset failed, giving up

Does the attached patch fix things?

It basically reverts the patch, while still maintaining the consolidation. It looks like that status evaluation is not as universal as believed.

	Jeff



diff --git a/include/linux/libata.h b/include/linux/libata.h
index 7e206da..0f17643 100644
--- a/include/linux/libata.h
+++ b/include/linux/libata.h
@@ -1384,17 +1384,14 @@ static inline struct ata_port *ata_shost_to_port(struct Scsi_Host *host)
 
 static inline int ata_check_ready(u8 status)
 {
-	/* Some controllers report 0x77 or 0x7f during intermediate
-	 * not-ready stages.
-	 */
-	if (status == 0x77 || status == 0x7f)
-		return 0;
+	if (!(status & ATA_BUSY))
+		return 1;
 
 	/* 0xff indicates either no device or device not ready */
 	if (status == 0xff)
 		return -ENODEV;
 
-	return !(status & ATA_BUSY);
+	return 0;
 }
 
 

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux