Re: [PATCHSET #upstream] libata: improve FLUSH error handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mark Lord <liml@xxxxxx> writes:
> 
> Really, the entire flush + retries etc.. should never, ever, be permitted
> to take more than XX seconds total.  Not 60 seconds per retry, but XX seconds
> total for the original command + however many retries we can fit in there.

I fully agree. Also please make that user limit settable use module_param too,
not only sysfs. I recently had the pleasure to deal with a failing disk
which started to spew errors already on device probing and it somewhat
annoyed me that that slowed down boot up time that much. Perhaps the default
during device probing should be also lower?

-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux