Re: [PATCHSET #upstream] libata: improve FLUSH error handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Jeff Garzik wrote:
Ric Wheeler wrote:
I think that the 30 seconds was meant to be that worst case time for the drive to respond to a command. We try to push vendors to respond in much less time than that (it's important to get things like the fast fail path for RAID working correctly), say something like 10-15 seconds.


Multiple vendors say the FLUSH CACHE worst case can exceed 30 seconds though...

    Jeff

That might be true, but in that case, I still think we should never retry the flush ;-)

ric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux