On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 12:24:45 -0500 Mark Lord <liml@xxxxxx> wrote: > Alan Cox wrote: > >> NAK. There's no guarantee that the next command after an error > >> will always be REQUEST_SENSE. Or is there? > > > > For that device over ATAPI I believe the guarantee is there, the same as > > for SCSI. > .. > > Even for SG_IO w/o requesting sense data? Thats a very good question. Yes we might need to ignore ERR at that point. Another possibility would be to notice if ERR seems to be stuck after we are finished so we know for next time. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
