Re: [PATCH] libata: workaround DRQ=1 ERR=1 for ATAPI tape drives

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> NAK.  There's no guarantee that the next command after an error
> will always be REQUEST_SENSE.   Or is there?

For that device over ATAPI I believe the guarantee is there, the same as
for SCSI.

Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux