Re: SATA_SIL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



[restoring linux-ide, please don't drop cc]

Frans de Boer wrote:
> Hello sir,
> 
> I just checked: the SuSE 2.6.22.9-0.4 source for sata_sil.c (among
> others) is NOT the same as the stock 2.6.22.9. Looking at your reply, I
> quess that I have to skip 2.6.23 and use the next 2.6.24 release?

Is it sata_sil or sata_sil24?  You were talking about sil24 in the
original message.

> On a more modern system, - without the sil chips - SuSE 10.3 with the
> newer 2.6.23.1 kernel is working just fine.
> 
> Do you  still like to recieve my report as suggested by you?

Yeah, it should just work.  Thanks.

-- 
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux