Re: SATA_SIL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Both sil and sil24 are not the same compared to the stock 2.6.22.9
kernel.

On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 10:11 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> [restoring linux-ide, please don't drop cc]
> 
> Frans de Boer wrote:
> > Hello sir,
> > 
> > I just checked: the SuSE 2.6.22.9-0.4 source for sata_sil.c (among
> > others) is NOT the same as the stock 2.6.22.9. Looking at your reply, I
> > quess that I have to skip 2.6.23 and use the next 2.6.24 release?
> 
> Is it sata_sil or sata_sil24?  You were talking about sil24 in the
> original message.
> 
> > On a more modern system, - without the sil chips - SuSE 10.3 with the
> > newer 2.6.23.1 kernel is working just fine.
> > 
> > Do you  still like to recieve my report as suggested by you?
> 
> Yeah, it should just work.  Thanks.
> 
Uh, your reacte on which part? The part of just wait for the 2.6.24
release or that you recieve the boot.msg and hwinfo output?

KR,
Frans.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux