Re: [PATCH 2/7] sata_promise: pdc_freeze() semantic change

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tejun Heo wrote:
> Tejun Heo wrote:
> 
>>Mikael Pettersson wrote:
>>
>>>Albert's patch is OK as far as sata_promise is concerned, but
>>>I want to see an update of libata.tmpl and libata-eh.c to
>>>indicate the new, weakened, specification of freeze/thaw before
>>>I ACK this patch.
> 
> 
> Hmmm.... The docbook document is too stale at this point.  It needs
> major rewrite.  Also, I don't really think docbook is a good format for
> this type of documentation.  Can we switch to formatted plain text which
> can be converted to other formats?  Or use some form of inlined comment
> for callback documentation which can be gathered and formatted
> automatically?
> 
> Albert, do you mind updating the comment in libata-eh.c?
> 

No problem. Will fix the comments in the next revision.
--
albert


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux