Re: [PATCH 2/7] sata_promise: pdc_freeze() semantic change

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tejun Heo wrote:
> Mikael Pettersson wrote:
>> Albert's patch is OK as far as sata_promise is concerned, but
>> I want to see an update of libata.tmpl and libata-eh.c to
>> indicate the new, weakened, specification of freeze/thaw before
>> I ACK this patch.

Hmmm.... The docbook document is too stale at this point.  It needs
major rewrite.  Also, I don't really think docbook is a good format for
this type of documentation.  Can we switch to formatted plain text which
can be converted to other formats?  Or use some form of inlined comment
for callback documentation which can be gathered and formatted
automatically?

Albert, do you mind updating the comment in libata-eh.c?

-- 
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux