Re: [PATCH] libata: (round 5) add support for ATA_16 on ATAPI

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mark Lord wrote:
Resending, with a bug fixed, and default ata16_passthru=0.

This patch adds support for issuing ATA_16 passthru commands
to ATAPI devices managed by libata.  It requires the previous
CDB length fix patch.

A boot/module parameter, "ata16_passthru=1" can be used to
globally disable this feature, if ever desired.

Signed-Off-By: Mark :ord <mlord@xxxxxxxxx>
---
diff -u --recursive --new-file --exclude-from=old/Documentation/dontdiff old/drivers/ata/libata-core.c new/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
--- old/drivers/ata/libata-core.c    2007-02-02 12:29:10.000000000 -0500
+++ new/drivers/ata/libata-core.c    2007-02-02 12:29:03.000000000 -0500
@@ -82,6 +82,10 @@
module_param(atapi_dmadir, int, 0444);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(atapi_dmadir, "Enable ATAPI DMADIR bridge support (0=off, 1=on)");

+int ata16_passthru = 0;
+module_param(ata16_passthru, int, 0444);
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(ata16_passthru, "Enable passthru of SCSI opcode 0x85 to ATAPI devices (0=off, 1=on)");
+
int libata_fua = 0;
module_param_named(fua, libata_fua, int, 0444);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(fua, "FUA support (0=off, 1=on)");
diff -u --recursive --new-file --exclude-from=old/Documentation/dontdiff old/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c new/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
--- old/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c    2007-02-02 12:29:10.000000000 -0500
+++ new/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c    2007-02-02 12:29:25.000000000 -0500
@@ -2688,6 +2688,10 @@

static inline ata_xlat_func_t ata_get_xlat_func(struct ata_device *dev, u8 cmd)
{
+    if (dev->class == ATA_DEV_ATAPI)
+        if (cmd != ATA_16 || ata16_passthru)
+            return atapi_xlat;
+
    switch (cmd) {
    case READ_6:
    case READ_10:
@@ -2746,27 +2750,28 @@
                      void (*done)(struct scsi_cmnd *),
                      struct ata_device *dev)
{
-    int rc = 0;
-
-    if (unlikely(!scmd->cmd_len || scmd->cmd_len > dev->cdb_len)) {
-        DPRINTK("bad CDB len=%u, max=%u\n",
-            scmd->cmd_len, dev->cdb_len);
+    ata_xlat_func_t xlat_func;
+    int rc = 0, max_len;
+    u8 scsi_op = scmd->cmnd[0];
+
+ if (scsi_op == ATA_16 && dev->class == ATA_DEV_ATAPI && !ata16_passthru)
+        max_len = 16;
+    else
+        max_len = dev->cdb_len;
+ +    if (unlikely(!scmd->cmd_len || scmd->cmd_len > max_len)) {
+         DPRINTK("bad CDB len=%u, max=%u\n",
+             scmd->cmd_len, max_len);

looks like a chompified patch (double '+')


        scmd->result = DID_ERROR << 16;
        done(scmd);
        return 0;
    }

-    if (dev->class == ATA_DEV_ATA) {
-        ata_xlat_func_t xlat_func = ata_get_xlat_func(dev,
-                                  scmd->cmnd[0]);
-
-        if (xlat_func)
-            rc = ata_scsi_translate(dev, scmd, done, xlat_func);
-        else
-            ata_scsi_simulate(dev, scmd, done);
-    } else
-        rc = ata_scsi_translate(dev, scmd, done, atapi_xlat);
-
+    xlat_func = ata_get_xlat_func(dev, scsi_op);
+    if (xlat_func)
+        rc = ata_scsi_translate(dev, scmd, done, xlat_func);
+    else
+        ata_scsi_simulate(dev, scmd, done);
    return rc;


this looks like a bug? ata_scsi_simulate() should not be called for ATAPI devices.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux