Re: [PATCH 2/3] libata: add missing CONFIG_PM in LLDs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Alan Cox wrote:
> Ughhhhhhhhh...
> 
> Can we not just provide dummy methods ?

I agree that it's ugly but LDDs often wrap standard routines and with
the third patch all standard routines are gone thus forcing LLDs to omit
PM functions if !CONFIG_PM.  If we supply dummy core functions, forcing
LLDs to skip private PM functions is difficult.
ata_scsi_device_suspend/resume() will disappear soon, so the clutter
will be reduced.  Any prettier ideas?

-- 
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux