On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 21:02:46 +0900 Tejun Heo <htejun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Alan Cox wrote: > > Ughhhhhhhhh... > > > > Can we not just provide dummy methods ? > > I agree that it's ugly but LDDs often wrap standard routines and with > the third patch all standard routines are gone thus forcing LLDs to omit > PM functions if !CONFIG_PM. If we supply dummy core functions, forcing > LLDs to skip private PM functions is difficult. If CONFIG_PM is not defined then they will not get called and they generally wrap the functions that would become dummies ? Am I missing something ? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
