Re: 2.6.20-rc6: known unfixed regressions (v2) (part 2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Mike Christie wrote:
>> Actually, I do not think we did this in 2.6.19. Tomo added a bug when he
>> ported a patch and mixed up some things so we did something weird for
>> 2.6.20-rc1.
> 
> Ah, ok. Warring bugs.  Have you pinpointed the original one? Is it your 
> original "block: support larger block pc requests" after all? It looks 
> like yours is the one that did the big changes, with Tomo then fixing some 
> of the fallout?

I am not completely convinced this bug is the "block: support larger
block pc requests" patches fault. If I revert the jiffies_to_msecs usage
then it works for me. On my system I have
CONFIG_HZ_250=y
CONFIG_HZ=250

With the attached patch, nero finds the cd drives and I can burn disks.
There is no errors from the ide layer like before.
diff --git a/block/scsi_ioctl.c b/block/scsi_ioctl.c
index 2528a0c..aded9a0 100644
--- a/block/scsi_ioctl.c
+++ b/block/scsi_ioctl.c
@@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ static int sg_io(struct file *file, requ
 
 	rq->cmd_type = REQ_TYPE_BLOCK_PC;
 
-	rq->timeout = jiffies_to_msecs(hdr->timeout);
+	rq->timeout = (hdr->timeout * HZ) / 1000;
 	if (!rq->timeout)
 		rq->timeout = q->sg_timeout;
 	if (!rq->timeout)

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux