Re: 2.6.20-rc6: known unfixed regressions (v2) (part 2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Mike Christie wrote:
> 
> rq->bio is NULL here, so no data is coped back to userspace and it seems
> nero just stops trying to talk to the drive after this.

Well, except that's what we used to do in 2.6.19 too. So what changed?

> Because nero just gives up, no more commands are sent and we do not get
> flooded with status errors like before so it sort of looks like it
> solves the problem but it doesn't - at least that is what is happening here.

Yeah, I can't burn with Nero either, although I'll also say that I've 
never even tried before, so my leet Nero skillz are nonexistant.

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux