Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 05:26:43PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: >> Greg KH wrote: >>> Hm, but I guess without the follow-up patches for libata, it will not >>> really get tested much. Jeff, if I accept this, what's your feelings of >>> letting libata be the "test bed" for it? >> >> It would be easiest for me to merge this through my >> libata-dev.git#upstream tree. That will auto-propagate it to -mm, and >> ensure that both base and libata bits are sent in one batch. >> >> Just shout if you see NAK-able bits... >> >> Work for you? > > That works for me. Great, I'll push it through Jeff. > The only question I have is on the EXPORT_SYMBOL() stuff for the new > driver/base/ functions. Tejun, traditionally the driver core has all > exported symbols marked with EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(). So, any objection to > marking the new ones (becides the "mirror" functions) in this manner? Okay, will do so. Thanks. -- tejun - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
