Thierry Vignaud wrote:
Tejun Heo <htejun@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
The second patch is essentially identical to what you did the
one liner. Can you please check it once more? I'll prepare
old-sequence hardreset in the meantime.
Okay, here's the old-sequence hardreset patch. This should have
the highest chance of working. This patch should be applied on
top of the vt6420 patch.
On top of which patch?
I just tried to apply it on top of:
- your last week patch
- your two patches of this week
and it does *not* apply on top of anyone...
Arghh... Sorry. I sent the wrong version. This patch is against
#upstream while I should have sent the one against #upstream-fixes.
Couldn't you either check first your patch or (better) just send a
patch against vanilla 2.6.18-rc4-mm2?
I've attached whole sata_via.c to the other mail. I think that should
do the trick.
It didn't (tested by overwriting 2.6.18-rc4-mm2's driver).
I tried a few reset methods combinations w/os success.
Like in other faillure cases, the driver saw the two links but failed
to see the hd attached to the second sata link.
Hmmm.. That's very weird. The detection sequence is almost identical to
the original code. Argh..... Any ideas?
--
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
