Thierry Vignaud wrote:
Tejun Heo <htejun@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
none of both these patches worked :-(
The second didn't work? But you said the following one liner worked.
--- drivers/ata/sata_via.c.tv6 2006-08-20 16:37:41.000000000 +0200
+++ drivers/ata/sata_via.c 2006-08-20 17:20:23.000000000 +0200
@@ -244,7 +244,7 @@
static void vt6421_error_handler(struct ata_port *ap)
{
- return ata_bmdma_drive_eh(ap, ata_std_prereset, NULL,
+ return ata_bmdma_drive_eh(ap, vt6420_prereset, ata_std_softreset,
sata_std_hardreset, ata_std_postreset);
}
The second patch is essentially identical to what you did the one liner.
Can you please check it once more? I'll prepare old-sequence
hardreset in the meantime.
Okay, here's the old-sequence hardreset patch. This should have the
highest chance of working. This patch should be applied on top of the
vt6420 patch.
On top of which patch?
I just tried to apply it on top of:
- your last week patch
- your two patches of this week
and it does *not* apply on top of anyone...
Arghh... Sorry. I sent the wrong version. This patch is against
#upstream while I should have sent the one against #upstream-fixes.
Couldn't you either check first your patch or (better) just send a
patch against vanilla 2.6.18-rc4-mm2?
I've attached whole sata_via.c to the other mail. I think that should
do the trick.
thanks.
--
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
