Re: [PATCH 3/9] libata: implement per-dev xfermask

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ar Sul, 2006-08-06 am 23:41 +0900, ysgrifennodd Tejun Heo:
> I see.  I have a question though.  ATM, there are a few drives in the 
> current #upstream which deal with PATA devices (ata_piix, pdc_adma and 
> sata_promise).  Will they all act correctly without the above logic?  If 
> so, I'll drop the above part and regenerate the tree.  If not, it can 
> stay till those drivers are patched.

I went through them checking earlier. The majority of chipsets snoop the
drive select bit and will generate appropriate cycles by device
according to that bit.  Not everything does but I have been through and
made sure the ones that don't correctly merge timings. At least I hope I
have them all anyway.


-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux