Re: [PATCH 04/12] libata-hp-prep: update ata_scsi_find_dev() and friends

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2006-05-29 at 15:25 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> 113b8fe60b97a6ce664d6098f23b56b75247de87
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libata-scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/libata-scsi.c
> index 9e5cb9f..9adc5c1 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/libata-scsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/libata-scsi.c
> @@ -52,8 +52,12 @@ #include "libata.h"
>  #define SECTOR_SIZE	512
>  
>  typedef unsigned int (*ata_xlat_func_t)(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc, const u8 *scsicmd);
> -static struct ata_device *
> -ata_scsi_find_dev(struct ata_port *ap, const struct scsi_device *scsidev);
> +
> +static struct ata_device * __ata_scsi_find_dev(struct ata_port *ap,
> +					const struct scsi_device *scsidev);
> +static struct ata_device * ata_scsi_find_dev(struct ata_port *ap,
> +					    const struct scsi_device *scsidev);
> +
>  
>  #define RW_RECOVERY_MPAGE 0x1
>  #define RW_RECOVERY_MPAGE_LEN 12
> @@ -2308,6 +2312,23 @@ static unsigned int atapi_xlat(struct at
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static struct ata_device * ata_find_dev(struct ata_port *ap, int id)
> +{
> +	if (likely(id == 0 || (id == 1 && ap->flags & ATA_FLAG_SLAVE_POSS)))
> +		return &ap->device[id];
> +	return NULL;
> +}
> +

>From my understanding, the definition of function ata_find_dev() should
be in libata-core.c instead of libata-scsi.c. Does it make sense to you?

Thanks,
Forrest
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux