Re: [PATCH] Re: 2.6.17-rc5-git1: regression: resume from suspend(RAM) fails: libata issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Linus Torvalds wrote:

On Sat, 27 May 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Objections? Can everybody confirm that a clean current git tree with just this doesnt' have any huge downsides?

Perhaps more importantly, can anybody imagine any realistic possible downsides at all? Both waits have an _eventual_ timeout (although the busy wait is pretty damn long), so even the most perverse controller should at worst just wait a fairly long time.

And we're doing nothing but reading the status register, so I don't see any reasonable breakage.

Well,

* The second wait is pointless, but harmless

* Modern FIS-based controllers (ahci, sata_sil24, SAS HBAs) don't poll for BSY, ATA is completely packetized and different. But still harmless, since only ata_piix suspends. The code must go elsewhere, when other controllers start suspending.

Thus, no objections for 2.6.17.

	Jeff



-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux