On Sat, May 27 2006, Mark Lord wrote: > Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > >On Sun, 28 May 2006, Jens Axboe wrote: > >>Works for me too, I changed the delay to match the 200000 above just to > >>be on the safe side. > > > >That's insane. That was _not_ what I expected. That wasn't actually > >supposed to fix anything at all for somebody who had problems. > > The newly added ata_wait_idle() call waits on both BUSY and DRQ, > so perhaps the wait on DRQ was what "fixed" it this time for Jens? It must be, unless the changed delay makes difference (unlikely). -- Jens Axboe - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html