Re: [PATCH] Re: 2.6.17-rc5-git1: regression: resume from suspend(RAM) fails: libata issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff Garzik wrote:
Linus Torvalds wrote:
What's the layering violation in just having ATA resume make sure it's not ATA_BUSY?

Why are you guys fighting over this?

As soon as we start powering on the SATA phy (code exists, 2.6.18), or dealing with port multipliers (code exists, 2.6.19), the "working patch" stops working.

so basically when the SCSI and libata suspend is used for any controller other than ata_piix, really :)

	Jeff


-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux