Albert Lee wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sata_vsc.c b/drivers/scsi/sata_vsc.c
index 9646c39..0372be7 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/sata_vsc.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sata_vsc.c
@@ -221,14 +221,21 @@ static irqreturn_t vsc_sata_interrupt (i
ap = host_set->ports[i];
- if (ap && !(ap->flags &
- (ATA_FLAG_DISABLED|ATA_FLAG_NOINTR))) {
+ if (is_vsc_sata_int_err(i, int_status)) {
+ u32 err_status;
+ printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: ignoring interrupt(s)\n", __FUNCTION__);
+ err_status = ap ? vsc_sata_scr_read(ap, SCR_ERROR) : 0;
+ vsc_sata_scr_write(ap, SCR_ERROR, err_status);
+ handled++;
+ }
+
+ if (ap && !(ap->flags & ATA_FLAG_DISABLED)) {
struct ata_queued_cmd *qc;
The if(is_vsc_sata_int_err(i, int_status)) { } block is not irq-pio related.
Maybe it is from somewhere else?
It is from the merge I did with upstream, which conflicted in this area.
Is it not correct somehow, or just unexpected?
Your 'minor fix' patch is now in my Pending folder.
Jeff
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
