On Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 06:15:21PM +0000, Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2019-01-04 19:06, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > >> Instead of leaving these open-coded and prone to type mistakes, we can > >> now use the new struct_size() helper: > > > > I am okay with this patch in general. However, I think the name of the > > helper 'struct_size' is a bit unfortunate. I really wondered on the > > first read why it needs 3 arguments to find out a struct size. I only > > understood on the second read. I think 'trailing_array_struct_size' > > would be way more clearer what it does. > > I read that as an Acked-by... :-) For this patch, yes. Thanks!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
